Would People Really Live at Sea Full-Time?

People talk a lot about the concept of living at sea, but one question comes up more than almost any other:

Would people actually live onboard year-round?

The answer, according to a recent Live at Sea community poll, is yes , and by a larger margin than many people expected.

When community members were asked how many months per year they would realistically live onboard a cruise residence, the single largest group selected 12 months per year.

In other words, full-time living at sea.

That option received 38% of the total vote.

That number surprised a lot of people. After all, most people still view cruise ships primarily as vacation experiences rather than permanent residences. But as the residential cruising concept gains momentum, perceptions appear to be shifting.

What makes the poll especially interesting is the broader breakdown.

While 38% said they would happily live onboard year-round, another 20% selected between 7 and 11 months annually. Meanwhile, 42% said they would spend six months or less onboard.

When all responses were averaged together, the community landed at roughly 8.5 months per year living at sea.

That number may ultimately represent the sweet spot for residential cruising.

Rather than replacing land life entirely, many people appear to envision a hybrid lifestyle , part floating residence, part traditional home base.

That makes sense for several reasons.

Family obligations, healthcare access, business commitments, and personal routines still tie many people to life on land. Even among enthusiastic supporters of residential cruising, there’s recognition that full-time ship life may not fit every stage of life equally.

Yet the poll also demonstrates something important:

The idea is no longer viewed as unrealistic.

Only a few years ago, the concept of spending most of the year living aboard a cruise ship would have sounded extreme to the average person. Today, a large percentage of this community views it as not only possible, but desirable.

A few things are probably contributing to that shift in thinking.

First, remote work has fundamentally altered how many people think about location. For growing numbers of professionals, work is no longer tied to a single city or office. Reliable internet and flexible schedules have opened the door to more mobile lifestyles.

Second, many people are rethinking what “home” actually means.

Traditional homeownership comes with rising costs, maintenance responsibilities, taxes, insurance, and geographic limitations. Residential cruising offers an alternative model built around mobility, simplicity, and experience.

Instead of mowing lawns or dealing with winter weather, residents imagine waking up in Greece, Japan, South America, or Alaska.

That emotional appeal is powerful.

At the same time, the poll suggests that most people still value balance.

The fact that 42% selected six months or less indicates many residents may initially approach ship life gradually rather than diving into permanent residency immediately.

That’s probably healthy.

Residential cruising doesn’t need every resident to commit to 365 days per year in order to succeed. In fact, flexibility may become one of the model’s biggest strengths.

Some residents may spend winters onboard and summers near family. Others may rotate between multiple residences throughout the year. Retirees, entrepreneurs, digital nomads, and part-time travelers may all use residential cruising differently.

The key insight from the poll is that people are actively imagining how this lifestyle could fit into their real lives.

That’s a major shift.

The idea is starting to move from fantasy into something people can realistically picture themselves doing.

People are beginning to ask:

  • How long would I stay?
  • Which destinations would matter most?
  • What kind of community would I want onboard?
  • How would healthcare, fitness, dining, and social life work long-term?

Those are the kinds of questions people ask when an idea starts feeling real.

And based on this poll, living at sea is beginning to feel very real to a growing number of people.

Avora Lumina Cruise Condo Ship: Is This the Real Deal?

The latest Avora Lumina webinar pulled back the curtain a bit more on where things actually stand.

There’s progress. There’s momentum. And there are still a few gaps that have not magically solved themselves.

But after watching the update and following up directly with company president Chris Cox, I came away with one major takeaway: Avora Lumina is starting to feel less like a concept and more like something that is actually happening.

The 5-Year Plan Upgrade May Be a Game Changer

The biggest thing that stood out to me was the newly clarified option to purchase the 5-year plan and then upgrade later to life-of-ship residency.

That is a game changer because it reduces the upfront cost and risk associated with these new residential cruise concepts. I was a bit surprised by the announcement, so I reached out to Chris Cox for clarification.

He explained that the upgrade from the 5-year plan to life-of-ship residency is prorated based on time spent onboard:

“The upgrade from 5 years to life of ship is pro-rated based upon the time spent onboard. Day one through 365, upgrades would be credited at 80% of 5 year plan price, day 366 through the end of year 2 would be credited at 60%, etc.”

The bottom line is that it appears best to upgrade either before you board or before day 365 onboard.

My guess is that they were able to offer this structure because of the 9-year payout they negotiated with NCL for the ship.

Sales Progress and the Real Target

The project is currently about 15% sold, with roughly 20 months until launch.

That is respectable, but it is not exactly champagne territory.

The real goal is 35% sold before launch, which is where things start to look financially solid. A broader marketing push is kicking off this week, which feels less like a victory lap and more like a necessary gear shift.

Customization and the Upgrade Question

One of the stronger selling points is flexibility. Units can be customized, which helps this feel more like a residence and less like a dressed-up cruise cabin.

The 5-year ownership model with an upgrade option to lifetime residency also adds flexibility. Owners can apply a portion of their original purchase price toward that upgrade, based on the prorated schedule.

That said, one important question still matters: will the life-of-ship upgrade be priced at today’s rates or at whatever rates exist later?

That detail matters a lot, and right now it still feels like it is floating somewhere out at sea.

Dry Dock Timeline and Phased Conversion

The ship will go through two dry dock periods before fully becoming a residential vessel: October 2026 and December 2027.

That tells you this is not a one-step transformation. It is more of a phased evolution, which is probably realistic given the scale of what they are trying to do.

Operations and the Apollo Angle

They again confirmed that Apollo Group will be running the dining experience and hotel operations.

That is meaningful because Apollo already has a relationship with Regent Seven Seas. If that operating partnership holds, it suggests Avora is aiming to maintain a similar ultra-luxury cruise experience to what Regent delivers today.

Given the monthly fees, I think most buyers would expect that level of service.

Lifestyle Tradeoffs

No pets on this ship.

For some people, that is a minor inconvenience. For others, it is a hard stop. For my wife and me, it kind of sucks.

They did mention that pets are being considered for future ships, which is corporate-speak for “not now, maybe later.”

Expansion Plans and NCL Talks

The team is already in discussions with Norwegian Cruise Line about additional vessels.

Founder Mike Petterson said, “There are many more ships should we need it,” implying that more could eventually hit the market.

It took about two years to land the original NCL deal, which gives you a sense of how slow and complex these negotiations are. Whether Residential Cruise Holdings converts more ships or not, this is starting to look like a model: taking certain cruise ships and refitting them to become residential ships.

Expansion is clearly part of the vision, but it is not something that happens quickly or easily.

A Reminder From Villa Vie

Villa Vie came up as a quiet cautionary example.

Their ship was offline for over four years in cold layup, and getting it operational again was not exactly smooth sailing for the company. The founder now says they are 80% sold out.

It is a useful reminder that converting and reviving ships is complicated, expensive, and very easy to underestimate.

I can attest to this personally. My brother and I once thought we got a great deal on a 74-foot Ferretti yacht we bought in foreclosure. The previous owner had ignored it for two years, and it took us hundreds of thousands of dollars to try to get it back into shape.

That experience taught me that when something has been sitting too long, the purchase price is only the beginning. The real cost shows up later, usually in the form of repairs, delays, surprises, and invoices that seem to reproduce when no one is watching.

To be clear, Avora is a different situation. The ship is currently operated and maintained by NCL, with the intent of maximizing the life of the vessel. That is a very different starting point than bringing a neglected ship back from cold layup.

What Buyers Are Choosing

The Radiance suite is emerging as one of the most popular options.

At roughly 363 square feet with a balcony, it seems to land in the sweet spot between livability and price. It is not too cramped, not wildly expensive, and it has fresh air.

It’s hard to imagine living at sea without a balcony.

When my wife and I chose to buy a suite on Avora, we chose the Solstice suite simply because it had a balcony, even though it was more expensive and smaller than the option of combining two Dawn suites into roughly 600 square feet.

For us, the balcony mattered more.

That may sound like a small thing on paper, but when you are talking about living on a ship, fresh air and private outdoor space are not really luxuries. They are sanity preservation tools with nicer branding.

So, Is Avora Lumina the Real Deal?

Avora Lumina is moving forward, but it is still early.

There is real momentum, but sales need to accelerate, some key details remain unresolved, and execution is going to determine everything.

That said, I am pleasantly surprised by the level of transparency they continue to provide. That is one of the reasons I continue to feel more comfortable with this project than I might have expected at the beginning.

Readers of LiveAtSea.com or members of the Facebook group already know that my wife and I purchased a Solstice Suite on Avora. I broke down the key reasons we made that decision in this article here.

But if I had to sum up why we purchased, it comes down to this:

Community. And the fact that it really appears to be happening.

Working from the Ocean: How Remote Work Is Reshaping Life at Sea

Residential cruising used to have a single archetype: the wealthy retiree, freed from work, drifting through the world’s ports on someone else’s schedule. That archetype is dying, and what’s replacing it is more interesting.

The new resident is just as likely to be a 30-something founder running a company from a balcony, a consultant on Zoom calls between Singapore and Cape Town, or an accountant logging into her firm’s systems from a suite while the ship transits the Mediterranean. Reliable maritime internet has rewired the economics of life at sea, and the live-at-sea community is feeling it.

Cruise Life as Digital Nomadism, Continued

The framing that resonates most with working-age residents is that residential cruising is simply the next chapter of a movement that already exists: digital nomadism.

“I look at cruise living as a subcategory of being a digital nomad. I am not retired, and the fact that I still need to work would alleviate much of the downside of living on a cruise ship.” — Live at Sea Community Member

The argument is simple: nomads already work from coffee shops in Lisbon, co-working spaces in Bali, and rented apartments in Mexico City. A ship is just a moving apartment with better views and pre-arranged logistics.

For someone whose income is location-independent, a residential cabin can be cheaper than maintaining a primary home plus chasing Airbnbs around the world. The ship becomes the home, the office, and the travel platform, all in one fee.

The Starlink Revolution

The single biggest change driving this shift is internet quality.

“I am 55, but the ability to work on a ship with Starlink changes the equation.” — Live at Sea Community Member

Maritime Starlink and similar low-latency satellite systems have transformed what’s possible at sea. Five years ago, ship internet meant slow email, intermittent connections, and surcharges that made a Zoom call a luxury. Today, video calls, cloud collaboration, and full-bandwidth participation in distributed teams are routine on most modern residential ships.

That single technological change has expanded the addressable audience for residential cruising by an order of magnitude. Anyone who can work from a laptop can now seriously consider it.

The Hybrid Model

Most working residents adopt some version of a hybrid setup: in the office or on land during port stays near home, fully remote during longer voyages.

“I’m preparing my business for a more remote setup. I’ll still be in the office when I’m in town, but when I’m onboard, I’ll be working via high-speed internet. You’ll find me on Zoom just as often.” — Colin, a Live at Sea Community Member

This model preserves the things that genuinely require physical presence (key client meetings, hands-on team time, family events) while shifting the bulk of the year onto a distributed, remote-friendly rhythm.

For business owners, the transition often forces a healthy redesign:

  • Tighter delegation to on-the-ground leaders
  • Cleaner documentation and SOPs
  • Better async communication systems
  • More structured meeting cadences
  • Cloud-first infrastructure

These are the same upgrades remote-first companies have been making for years. Residential cruising just provides the forcing function.

A New Category of Resident: The Working Owner

Worth naming explicitly because it changes how the lifestyle is sold:

The classic residential cruise pitch is built around freedom from work. The new pitch is freedom with work. You’re not retiring; you’re relocating your office to a moving address.

“More like a second home? In this case, the ship would be a primary home, and we would return to land to a much smaller footprint and for limited time.” — Rob, a Live at Sea Community Member

That reframes the whole financial picture. If you’re still earning, the cabin doesn’t have to be funded entirely from savings. Income offsets cost. The math gets meaningfully friendlier.

The Age Range Is Dropping

Operators have historically targeted the 65+ demographic,  and that audience still represents the largest share of buyers. But the working-age cohort is real and growing.

“I don’t know how old you are, but the average age on Villa Vie Odyssey is around 60. There are many in their 50s on the ship living very actively.” — Theresa, a Live at Sea Community Member

Expect that average to drop further as remote work normalizes and as ships explicitly cater to working residents: better Wi-Fi, more co-working spaces aboard, dedicated quiet zones, and time-zone-friendly programming.

The Practical Setup

If you’re planning to work from a residential cruise, the community’s collective advice converges on a few essentials:

1. Test your bandwidth needs honestly. Run a typical workday off your phone’s mobile hotspot for a week. If your work survives that, you’ll be fine on Starlink. If it doesn’t, identify which workflows fail and plan around them.

2. Build a port-day rhythm. Use port days for in-person meetings, document signings, banking, and anything that requires physical presence in a major city.

3. Design for time zones. If your team is based in one region, plan your itinerary so you’re not constantly waking up at 3 AM for calls. Some residents intentionally choose itineraries that align with their work hours.

4. Get the cabin layout right. A separate living area, a real desk, and good lighting matter more than balcony size when you’re working from the unit forty hours a week.

5. Build redundancy. Have a second connectivity option for critical calls, most residents pair the ship’s Wi-Fi with cellular data for redundancy in port.

The Bigger Shift

What’s happening here is bigger than a few entrepreneurs working from cruise cabins. Residential cruising is quietly becoming a legitimate option in the menu of remote-work lifestyles, alongside RV living, slow travel, and digital nomad hubs.

Less stuff. Smaller home base. Bigger world. Same career.

For a generation that’s increasingly skeptical of staying put, a moving home is starting to look less like an indulgence and more like an obvious choice.

Are You Working from the Ocean?

If you’re already running a business or a career from a residential ship, or planning to, the community needs your input. Share what’s working, what isn’t, and the lessons you wish someone had given you before you boarded.

Living at Sea With a Pet: What the Dream Leaves Out

Pets are family.

For a lot of people considering life at sea, that’s not a preference — it’s a dealbreaker. The idea of leaving an animal behind makes the whole thing non-negotiable. So before signing anything, they ask: can my pet come?

The answer is yes. But yes comes with a long list of things nobody puts in the brochure.

The most common misconception is that pet policy belongs to the ship operator. It doesn’t.

Even on a vessel that explicitly welcomes animals, international biosecurity law governs what actually happens when the ship enters a new country.

“It’s not just a cruise line decision. It’s a biosecurity question — and those two things operate on completely different timelines.”

Australia and New Zealand run some of the tightest biosecurity regimes in the world. The concern isn’t whether your dog is friendly. It’s disease transmission, parasites, environmental contamination, and how animal waste is handled at a population scale.

In practice, that means inspectors board the ship. Pets get documented and monitored. Owners pay inspection fees. And if a port lacks the infrastructure to receive animals, the ship may not dock there at all.

The itinerary bends around your pet — not the other way around.

Quarantine Is Not What You Picture

It’s easy to assume stricter regulations just mean your pet stays in the cabin.

That’s not always how it works. Residents aboard ships with animal policies report that in high-scrutiny regions, pets are moved to designated quarantine cabins — often on lower decks. Animals may be held in enclosures. Inspections can happen multiple times a day. Owner access gets restricted or put on a schedule.

That is a materially different experience from curling up on the couch together while you watch the ocean go by.

The Part That Catches People Off Guard

The biosecurity story doesn’t stop at animals.

Items that leave the ship — bicycles, hiking boots, golf clubs, wheelchairs — can face equal or greater scrutiny because they contact land environments directly. Your pet is part of a much larger regulatory ecosystem that the ship navigates constantly.

And when ships currently permit animals, day-to-day life tends to be more controlled than most people expect: pets confined to cabins, limited outdoor relief areas, most residents never encountering the animals at all unless they go looking.

For an indoor cat or an older, low-energy dog, this can work well. For active animals that need space and stimulation, it may not.

The Mobility Problem Nobody Discusses

The least-covered challenge is what happens when you want to leave the ship with your pet.

In most cases, you can’t. Animals are not permitted ashore. Veterinary care has to come to you. Moving between countries triggers additional import procedures that can be significant in both cost and complexity.

A pet onboard is not the same as a pet at home. It means committing to a far more stationary lifestyle than the live-at-sea concept typically implies.

The Bottom Line

Living at sea with a pet is possible. Early examples prove it.

But possible and simple are different things. Regulatory complexity, itinerary trade-offs, restricted mobility, and the realities of life in quarantine cabins are all part of the actual picture — not fine print.

The dream of waking up at sea with your animal beside you isn’t unrealistic. It just requires an honest conversation about what the animal’s life actually looks like once you get there.

Do the research before you book. The details matter more than the concept.

Buying a Cruise Ship Condo? Here’s Why This One Stood Out

Living at sea is no longer a fantasy. With reliable internet, a growing remote workforce, and new ownership models, it’s becoming a real option for entrepreneurs and investors.

After an initial failed attempt and exploring options like Villa Vie and The World, Colin C. Campbell and his wife landed on a different approach, one that blends lifestyle with practicality.

The decision came down to a few key factors: a community of like-minded owners, strong rental flexibility to offset costs, and a more livable, thoughtfully designed unit. Just as important, the ship itself offers longevity, ongoing upgrades, and a work-friendly environment that makes long-term living realistic.

The biggest shift is mindset. This isn’t just about travel, it’s about replacing traditional living with something more flexible, where your home moves and your life doesn’t have to pause.

It’s a bold move, but one that’s becoming increasingly viable.

Read the full breakdown, including costs, layout, and investment potential on Startup Club. 

Cost of Living on a Residential Cruise Ship vs Land: What You’re Missing

People hear “residential cruise ship” and their brains go to two places: How much does it cost? And can I afford it?

Both are the wrong question.

The better question is this: how does the true cost of living on land actually compare to life at sea when you include everything?

The Hidden Math of Land Living

Most cost comparisons between life at sea and life on land start with the wrong number,  what people think they spend on land, not what they actually spend.

When people compare the cost of living on a residential cruise ship vs land, they usually underestimate what land actually costs.

The real figure is always higher. Sales tax on most purchases. Property tax. Electricity, water, internet. Multiple insurance policies, liability, wind, flood, each its own line item. Dining out. Vacations that ironically include cruises.

When you total it honestly, the gap between what you imagine your monthly burn rate is and what it actually is gets surprisingly small.

Life on a ship bundles most of that away. No utility bills. No separate insurance riders for hurricane risk. No car. No property tax.

For many people, living on a residential cruise ship can be cheaper than living on land, but not because the ship is cheap. It’s because land is more expensive than anyone admits.

Ships Depreciate. Own That.

A cabin on a residential cruise ship is not a real estate investment. It depreciates , like a car, not like a condo.

Holly, an Odyssey resident and founder, puts it more directly. “I cringe at the term investment in conjunction with any boat, as I used to own my own. How do we encourage people to hear this instead of what they want to hear?”

That last phrase, “what they want to hear”, captures the real risk. Buyers pattern-match cabin purchases to real estate, where land appreciates and equity builds. Ships do the opposite. Hulls age. Mechanical systems wear. Even immaculately maintained vessels eventually retire.

Rob, another community member, argues the language used to sell cabins should be re-categorized entirely. “It should be labeled initiation fee, like a country club. Unlike a house or condo, you have NOTHING at the end of the term.”

Whether or not you accept the country club framing, the underlying point is worth taking seriously. Model the purchase as prepaid lifestyle, not capital investment.

The capital you put in isn’t working for you the way it would in a dividend-paying stock or a rental property. That’s a real trade-off, and the honest answer is to make it with open eyes.

The test is simple: if it were purely a financial play, institutional money would already own every unit. It doesn’t.

Because the return isn’t financial.

The Exceptions Worth Naming

There are documented cases where early buyers came out ahead,  and pretending they don’t exist would be dishonest.

Studio residences on The World sold for around $1 million when the ship launched in 2002. Today, comparable studios trade closer to $2.5 million. That’s meaningful appreciation over two decades, though it required holding through a major operational pivot in the ship’s early years.

More recently, some early buyers on Villa Vie Odyssey report cabin values up 25 to 30 percent from initial pricing. John, a Villa Vie resident, also pointed to early Storylines contracts now reportedly trading at more than twice their original price.

But these are stories about specific operators executing well over time. They are not evidence of an asset class with reliable upside. The right way to read them is as good news for early adopters who got the operator right, not as a baseline you should bake into your own decision.

If the appreciation happens for you, treat it as a bonus. If you need it to happen to make the math work, you’re buying for the wrong reasons.

The Rental Market That Hasn’t Arrived Yet

One gap in the model worth naming: short-term rental income.

Some cabin owners try to cover costs by renting their units when they leave the ship temporarily. The infrastructure for that market doesn’t really exist yet, no pricing tools, no distribution platforms, no standardized booking experience.

The demand is real, though. On a luxury residential vessel, daily maintenance fees can run around $600 for a double-occupancy unit. Comparable suites on the same class of ship rent through traditional luxury lines like Regent Seven Seas for $2,000 to $3,000 per night. If the rental infrastructure existed, the math would obviously work. Even at half those rates, fees would be covered.

But the demand-capture mechanism doesn’t exist yet, and that is the gap.

That will change. The same evolution that turned spare bedrooms into a global hospitality category will eventually reach residential ships. The timeline, though, is unknown,  and right now you can’t underwrite a cabin purchase on projected rental income. Plan around what exists today.

The Return Nobody Spreadsheets

This is the part most cost comparisons miss entirely.

No cooking. No cleaning. No driving. No airport security lines. A massage for $20 in port. Dental work for a fraction of the stateside cost. The experience of landing somewhere new and being treated as a neighbor, not a tourist passing through.

Add community. Genuine, recurring, chosen community, the kind that’s hard to manufacture on land and almost automatic when you’re 200 people living the same unusual life together.

Theresa, a Villa Vie Odyssey resident traveling with her child, reframes the entire investment question. “Living at sea and traveling is an investment in yourself. For me, it’s also an investment in my child and making priceless memories for both of us. It’s worth every damn penny.”

That reframe is the one most cost models miss. The ROI everyone tries to calculate is the wrong ROI.

Then add the world itself, experienced at a pace slow enough to actually absorb it.

None of that shows up in a cost-benefit analysis.

All of it compounds.

The Paradigm Is Shifting

It still sounds a little crazy to say you live on a ship. That’s part of what makes it interesting. Very few people on the planet have ever done it.

What’s changed is feasibility.

High-speed satellite internet, Starlink in particular, has dissolved the last real barrier for founders and remote operators. The business doesn’t have to pause. The team doesn’t have to wait.

The ship becomes just another place from which to run things, one that happens to wake up somewhere new every few days.

The Bottom Line

When you compare the cost of living on a residential cruise ship vs land, three things become clear:

First, most people underestimate what life on land actually costs.

Second, life at sea isn’t a traditional investment, the asset depreciates, exceptions are operator-specific, and there’s no reliable rental market yet.

Third, the real return isn’t financial. It’s experiential.

Life at sea isn’t for everyone. The logistics are real: travel home costs money, Medicare requires land-based access, shore excursions add up if you actually engage with the places you’re docking.

Anyone who tells you it’s purely cheaper is skipping a few line items.

But the people who thrive in it aren’t optimizing for cost.

They’re optimizing for a different life, deliberately, irreversibly, eyes wide open.

The ship is not the portfolio.

The ship is the life.

That’s what most people miss.

 

Quotes in the article are collected from Live at Sea community members 

Should Dogs and Cats and Whatever Live at Sea? The Debate Isn’t Settled

The idea of living at sea is no longer a fantasy. With residential cruise concepts gaining traction, a new question has surfaced:

Can pets come too?

For many, pets are family. The thought of leaving them behind is a dealbreaker. But bringing animals into a floating, internationally regulated environment turns out to be far more complex than it first appears.

The Vision: A Pet-Friendly Life at Sea

In theory, a pet-friendly cruise lifestyle sounds entirely possible.

Ships could be designed with dedicated pet areas, relief stations, onboard veterinary services, and even pet-specific amenities.

Some early examples already exist. Certain ships have allowed cats onboard, suggesting that a pet-inclusive model isn’t just hypothetical.

But that’s where the simplicity ends.

The Reality: It’s Not Just a Cruise Line Decision

One of the biggest misconceptions is that pet policies are controlled solely by the cruise operator.

They’re not.

Even if a ship allows pets, international regulations govern what happens when that ship enters different countries. Residents currently living aboard ships emphasize that pets are subject to strict biosecurity laws, regardless of whether they ever leave the vessel.

Biosecurity: The Real Constraint

Countries like Australia and New Zealand enforce some of the strictest biosecurity regulations in the world.

The concern isn’t just animals entering the country. It includes disease transmission, parasites, environmental contamination, and even how animal waste is handled.

In some cases, inspectors board the ship regularly, pets must be monitored and documented, owners may be required to pay inspection-related fees, and ships may only visit ports with proper animal control infrastructure.

If a port doesn’t meet these requirements, the ship may not be able to dock.

Quarantine Isn’t What You Think

It’s easy to assume pets simply stay in their owner’s cabin when regulations tighten.

In reality, it can be much stricter.

Residents report that in certain regions pets are moved to designated quarantine cabins, often on lower decks. Animals may be kept in enclosures for inspection, inspections can occur daily or even multiple times per day, and owner access can be restricted or scheduled.

This creates a very different experience from normal onboard living.

Itineraries Can Change Because of Pets

Allowing pets doesn’t just affect individual owners. It can impact the entire ship.

Ships have had to skip ports lacking biosecurity personnel and adjust itineraries based on regulatory requirements. While some residents consider this a minor inconvenience, others see it as a meaningful trade-off in destination flexibility.

It’s Not Just Pets Under Scrutiny

Interestingly, pets are only part of the biosecurity equation.

Items that leave the ship such as bicycles, golf clubs, wheelchairs, walkers, and even hiking boots can sometimes face equal or greater scrutiny since they interact directly with land environments.

This highlights how complex and far-reaching these regulations really are.

What Life Is Actually Like for Pets Onboard

On ships that currently allow animals, the day-to-day reality is more controlled than many expect.

Pets may be confined to cabins full-time, limited designated outdoor areas may exist, and many residents may never encounter the animals onboard unless they seek them out.

For some pets, especially older or indoor animals, this environment can work well. For others, it may not be ideal.

The Biggest Limitation: Mobility

One of the least discussed challenges is what happens when you want to leave the ship.

In most cases, pets are not allowed ashore. Veterinary care must be brought onboard. Leaving the ship with a pet may require full import procedures, and travel between countries introduces additional layers of regulation.

In practical terms, bringing a pet onboard often means committing to a much more stationary lifestyle than expected.

So Can Pets Live at Sea

The answer is not a simple yes or no.

A pet-friendly cruise lifestyle is clearly possible, and early examples prove it can be done.

But it comes with regulatory complexity, operational constraints, and lifestyle trade-offs.

As members of the residential cruise community have pointed out, it is achievable, but only with compromises and caveats.

Final Thought

The dream of living at sea with your pet isn’t unrealistic.

It’s just not as carefree as people imagine.

And once you bring international law, environmental protection, and a moving city into the equation, things get complicated fast.

World Cruise vs. Residential Cruise Ship: What’s the Real Difference?

I will be honest. I wasn’t entirely sure there was one when I first asked the question of our Live at Sea Facebook Group.

A world cruise can run three to five months. That’s not a vacation. That’s a season of your life lived at sea. So when I started wondering how a world cruise really compares to living on a residential ship, I figured the best people to ask were the ones who had actually done both.

I put the question to members of the Live at Sea Facebook group. The responses surprised me.

More Similar Than You’d Think

Before getting into the differences, it’s worth acknowledging the overlap.

Whether you’re on a five-month world cruise or a long-term residential ship, you’re dealing with the same realities. You’re away from family. You may have left pets behind, or in some cases brought them along. You’re figuring out how to stay connected to work, health care, and the life you had on land. The ship becomes your world, your dining room, your social life, your bedroom.

Those challenges don’t disappear based on what type of ship you’re on.

But the Ships Are Set Up Very Differently

That’s where the comparison starts to break down.

A world cruise is a commercial cruise experience, just a longer one. Lines like Silversea, Seabourn, Regent Seven Seas, and Explora Journeys design these voyages to be exceptional. And they are. You have a plethora of entertainment, live shows, casinos, formal nights, specialty dining, and a packed daily schedule. Ports come frequently, sometimes every day, and the efficiency of moving through destinations is part of the appeal. You are, in every sense of the word, on vacation.

A residential ship is something else entirely.

One member of the Live at Sea group who had completed three world cruises before boarding Villa Vie Residences Odyssey put it simply. A residential cruise doesn’t have an end date.

No shows. No captain’s parties. No dress codes. The ship is home and it’s structured that way.

Port Time: The Hidden Differentiator

One of the most overlooked points in the comparison is how much time you actually spend off the ship.

Many luxury world cruises, despite being marketed on their destinations, average only a handful of overnight stays across hundreds of days at sea. Theresa, who lives aboard Villa Vie Odyssey, looked at the longest currently bookable Oceania world cruise and was unimpressed. “Their current, longest 244-day world cruise has 12 overnights. No thanks,” she said.

That’s a meaningful gap. A typical world cruise visits a port for 8 to 10 hours, then sails overnight to the next stop. You see the highlights but rarely sleep in the country.

To be fair, not every world cruise looks the same. Suzanne pointed out that some Oceania itineraries do offer more depth. “Oceania says the Insignia and its up to 684 guests will visit 96 ports across 34 countries and five continents,” she noted, with 24 overnight stays in cities like Yangon, Reykjavik, and Tokyo. So overnights vary considerably from cruise to cruise. The buyer needs to read the itinerary carefully.

Residential cruise itineraries tend to favor longer port stays, multi-day stops, and slower pacing. John, who has lived aboard Villa Vie Odyssey for over fifteen months, framed the difference in terms of pace. “A world cruise is a fast cruise of only 100 to 200 days,” he says. “Odyssey takes three and a half years to circumnavigate the world. You only spend a few hours in each port on a world cruise. Odyssey usually spends at least one overnight in the vast majority of ports, and as much as five nights in some destinations, like Rio for Carnival. You really get to explore and see the places you visit.”

For some travelers, the rapid pace of a world cruise becomes the sticking point. Ben summed up the feeling that several members shared. “A different port almost every day is the exhausting part for me.”

If your goal is to experience a place rather than tour it, the residential model wins on this dimension.

What the Community Said

I asked Live at Sea members what they saw as the real advantages of each. Here’s what came back.

On world cruises, several members pointed to the experience itself. The luxury, the entertainment, the ports, the food. You’re living life to the fullest in a contained, curated environment. Everything is taken care of. Everything is designed to delight you. For people who want an extraordinary travel experience without restructuring their entire life, a world cruise delivers exactly that.

One member also noted the social dynamic. On a world cruise you’re meeting new people each sailing. For some, that’s a feature, not a limitation.

On residential ships, the word that came up most often was community.

John is one of the more prominent voices in the Live at Sea community and someone who has thought deeply about what separates residential cruising from anything else on the water. He’s also direct about flexibility. “On the Odyssey you can come and go as you please. You can even rent your villa for a period of time when you leave to visit home, take care of medical issues, or for whatever reason.”

But it’s community where John gets most personal. “The greatest experience on the Odyssey is the sense of community,” he says. “This became exceptionally apparent when one of our residents passed from a sudden heart attack. The way the community came together to honor his passing and celebrate his life was absolutely astounding. All residents support each other and help them through whatever difficulties are encountered.”

He’s also seen it change people. “We have seen many residents who boarded the ship and subsequently experienced life changing fulfillment and happiness living life on the Odyssey. We are living the dream life.” He’s quick to add that it isn’t for everyone. “There are also many that eventually decide this isn’t the life for them, or they have too many anchors in their life that hold them back. So they continue with their life on land.”

The crew relationship is different too. On Odyssey, crew members are considered part of the community, joining sailaways, sharing moments, visible in ways that feel personal rather than transactional.

Ship Size: An Underrated Factor

Both world cruises and residential ships span a range of vessel sizes, but residential cruising trends meaningfully smaller. And many residents say that’s a feature, not a limitation.

A smaller ship is more intimate. You learn names. You see the same crew every morning. The dining rooms feel like neighborhood restaurants rather than convention halls. That intimacy is part of what makes a residential ship feel like a community in the first place.

Smaller ships also unlock destinations that mega-vessels can’t reach. Jenny, who has cruised extensively, summed up both sides of the equation. “VVR advertises the advantage of a smaller ship was to be able to go places where large ships couldn’t, as in smaller fjords and rivers, which is true. But the downside that I’ve noticed is if you have to tender into port, it’s not possible if the seas are rough because of the smaller ship. And navigating rough seas in general seems to be worse in a smaller ship.” She added that one of her favorite voyages ever was a 100-passenger Galapagos cruise. “That was perfect.”

The tendering question is more complicated than it first appears, though. Cynthia, who completed Royal Caribbean’s Ultimate World Cruise on a much larger ship, pushed back on the assumption that bigger means better at tendering. “I’m not sure the smaller ship matters with regards to tendering. When we were on RC’s UWC, we missed far more tendering ports than we were able to visit.”

Tendering, in other words, isn’t strictly a small-ship problem. Weather and sea state cause missed ports across all classes of vessel. What does change with ship size is the trade between access and motion: smaller ships can reach more places, but you’ll feel more of the ocean while you do it.

Modern stabilization technology helps narrow that gap, and older residential ships often surprise residents with how well they handle motion. Still, anyone considering a smaller residential ship should be honest with themselves about how they tolerate movement at sea.

The Food Is Different Too

This one doesn’t get talked about enough.

On a world cruise you eat like you’re on vacation, because you are. Indulgent meals, specialty restaurants, everything available all the time. It’s part of the experience and it’s wonderful.

On a residential ship you eat like you live somewhere. Members cook occasionally, develop routines, and don’t necessarily want a five-course dinner every night. The relationship with food shifts from celebratory to simpler daily healthier cuisine. That’s not a downgrade. It’s just home.

What Does It Actually Cost?

This is where the two models really start to diverge.

A world cruise can range widely depending on the cruise line and the level of luxury. On mainstream cruise lines, four-month world cruises often start around $15,000 to $30,000 per person. But once you move into the luxury segment, the numbers climb quickly.

Luxury world cruises with lines like Silversea, Seabourn, and Regent Seven Seas commonly start around $80,000 to $100,000 per person, with premium suites climbing well past $300,000 for the full voyage. At the very top end, some of the most exclusive suites on ultra-luxury world cruises have sold for more than $800,000 per person.

When you break it down, many luxury world cruises fall somewhere between $300 and $800 per person per day, depending on the ship and what is included.

The luxury world cruise market is also clearly working. As Suzanne observed, “Luxury cruising seems to be doing well, so from my observation, there is a bigger market for cruises that may cost more per day, but don’t involve buying a cabin. I’m not sure that many people want to commit time or money to a cabin.” That’s a fair read of the broader market — most travelers still prefer to book a voyage rather than buy into one.

The key thing is that a world cruise is a one-time experience. You pay for the voyage, sail for several months, and when it ends, you return to life on land.

Residential cruise ships work very differently.

Instead of paying for a single voyage, you typically purchase or lease a residence on the ship.

On Villa Vie Odyssey, full ownership of an interior villa starts at about $129,999, with monthly service fees beginning around $1,999 per month for double occupancy. Balcony villas start around $329,000, with higher monthly fees depending on the category.

Villa Vie also offers several lower-commitment ways to live aboard. A five-year ownership option starts around $49,999, and month-to-month living aboard the ship begins at roughly $2,999 per person per month.

At the luxury end of the residential market, Avora Lumina, scheduled to launch in 2028, is positioning itself closer to high-end real estate than traditional cruising.

Residences on Lumina are expected to start around $545,000 and reach approximately $4.2 million for the largest homes on board. The ship will also offer a five-year ownership option starting around $219,600, giving residents a way to experience long-term life at sea without purchasing a full lifetime residence.

That structure changes the math completely.

Instead of comparing one cruise fare to another, you are comparing the cost of living on land to the cost of living at sea. For some people, especially retirees or remote workers, the numbers can end up surprisingly comparable once housing, travel, utilities, and daily expenses are factored in.

But the bigger difference is not just financial.

A world cruise is something you book.

A residential ship is somewhere you move.

Your Options Today

The residential cruise space is still small but growing. The World sits at the ultra-luxury end of the market. Villa Vie Odyssey offers a more accessible entry point. Avora Lumina is one of the more exciting newcomers, a newly converted residential ship formerly known as Regent Seven Seas Navigator, owned by NCL, and set to launch in January 2028. Several other residential ship concepts are in development and, hopefully, many more are coming.

The world cruise market, by contrast, is well established and expanding, with more luxury lines adding extended voyages every year.

My Takeaway

A world cruise is one of the greatest travel experiences you can have. The entertainment, the ports, the food, the people. You are absolutely living life to the fullest. But at the end of it, you go home.

On a residential cruise ship, you are already home.

That’s the real difference. A world cruise is a vacation, an extraordinary one. A residential cruise ship is a lifestyle. It’s not for everyone, but for the people who choose it, it tends to change everything.

The category even deserves its own name. Not a cruise ship. A lifestyle cruise ship.

This article was inspired by a discussion in the Live at Sea Facebook group. If you’re exploring life at sea, it’s one of the best communities on the internet to start.

 

Live at Sea community member quotes are used throughout the article 

Avora Lumina Is Selling Fast: Inside the Residential Cruise Ship That Is Turning Heads

As first reported on Startup.club and the Live at Sea Facebook Group, Avora Residences launched in February of 2026. Since then it is making serious waves in the world of residential cruising. And based on what I am hearing directly from the company, the market is responding.

I spoke personally with President Chris Cox just a few days ago. His message was straightforward. They are being overwhelmed with demand. In the weeks since the announcement, dozens of units have been sold or reserved. What is particularly interesting is that it is not just one segment of buyers driving that activity. The lower cost entry-level units are going fast. But the larger, higher-priced residences are also being snapped up quickly. Demand is coming from both ends of the market.

As one example, Avora has already sold or reserved approximately 40 percent of its Solstice Class units. For a ship that does not launch until January 2028, those numbers speak for themselves.

That kind of early momentum is hard to ignore.

What Is Avora Lumina?

Avora Lumina is a new residential cruise ship launching in January 2028. It is being converted from Regent Seven Seas Navigator, an ultra-luxury vessel owned by NCL. The project is led by Residential Cruise Holdings, the same company that operates Villa Vie Odyssey, giving it real operational experience in long-term life at sea.

This is not a concept. This is not a render on a website. The deal with NCL has been signed. The ship exists. The launch date is set.

That distinction matters more than it might seem.

A Ship I Have Sailed Before

I traveled on a Regent Seven Seas ship in 2023 and came away genuinely impressed. What stood out was not the size or the amenities — it was the feel of the ship. Fewer people. Staff who actually knew your name by day two. A level of personalized service that is hard to find on larger vessels. It felt less like a cruise and more like a private club that happened to be floating.

The new owners have no intention of walking away from what made the Navigator great.

The arrangement with Norwegian Cruise Line includes a nine-year charter with a nominal purchase option, establishing a long-term operational relationship with one of the most experienced maritime organizations in the world. Avora has committed to preserving the operational DNA of the Navigator wherever possible, which I think is a key winning move:  maintaining established systems, standards, and key vendor and service relationships that have defined the vessel’s performance over decades of global service. Having sailed the smaller Regent class ships, I can say it is probably one of the best floating experiences in the world. 

Regent Seven Seas is widely considered one of the top ultra-luxury cruise lines on the planet, combining exceptional gourmet dining, spacious all-suite accommodations, and staff-to-guest ratios that create a genuine five-star hotel experience at sea. Nearly everything is included: fine dining, premium wines, excursions, gratuities. The experience never feels nickel-and-dimed. The fact that Avora intends to preserve that operational culture rather than replace it is one of the most compelling things about this conversion. It truly will be an ultra luxury residence at sea.

As Kathy Villalba put it, “Navigator has a soul, built through years of disciplined operations, experienced crews, and trusted relationships. We intend to honor that legacy while transforming the ship into a true long-term residential platform.”

In my opinion, that is exactly the right approach.

Why This One Is Different

Getting in early on a cruise condo project has historically carried real risk. Several high-profile residential ship concepts have raised money, generated excitement, and then quietly disappeared before a single passenger ever boarded. Buyers have been burned.

Avora Lumina is different for a few reasons.

First, the ship is already in hand. Securing the rights to Regent Seven Seas Navigator through a deal with NCL removes one of the biggest uncertainties that has sunk other projects. There is no waiting for a shipyard to deliver a vessel that may or may not materialize.

Second, the operator has done this before. The operators also run Villa Vie Odyssey, which means the team understands what long-term residential living at sea actually requires. This is not a group of hotel developers guessing at how to run a ship. And to be clear they had their challenges and continue to work through them. And from my conversations with them have learned from those mistakes: what works and what doesn’t work. Converting a legacy cruise ship to residential condo doesn’t exactly have a playbook. 

Third, the legacy of the Navigator itself adds credibility. The bones of this ship are exceptional. Every unit is a relatively large suite based on traditional cruise ship standards, with residences ranging from approximately 300 to over 1,100 square feet. The ship underwent a $40 million refurbishment in 2016 and already has an apartment-like feel, with larger suites, laundry facilities, and a more intimate scale than the massive ships dominating cruising today. It is the kind of vessel that lends itself naturally to long-term living.

How the Ship Is Being Transformed

The deck plans tell the story better than any press release.

A Live at Sea employee shared side-by-side comparisons of the original Regent Seven Seas Navigator layout alongside the planned Avora Lumina conversion. The differences are deliberate and revealing.

Deck 7: Casino becomes a Business Center. On the Navigator, Deck 7 housed a full casino and boutiques — classic cruise ship amenities built for vacationers. On Avora Lumina, that space is being converted into a dedicated Business Center. This is one of the clearest signals of who this ship is being built for. Residents who work remotely or run businesses need productive space, not slot machines.

Deck 6: Entertainment becomes community spaces. The Navigator’s Deck 6 featured the Seven Seas Lounge, a Stars Lounge, and a Coffee Connection area branded around Club.com. 

Avora Lumina replaces this with the Lumina Lounge, a Library, a Solace Lounge, and a Card and Conference Room. The shift is from transient entertainment to spaces designed for longer-term living and gathering.

Deck 5: Compass Rose dining becomes Meridian House. The Navigator’s signature main dining room, Compass Rose, gave way to Meridian House on Avora Lumina. 

The footprint is similar but the name and concept shift signals a more residential dining philosophy rather than a formal cruise restaurant experience.

Deck 10: Pool deck gets refined. The Navigator’s pool deck featured La Veranda and Prime 7, well-known Regent dining venues. Avora Lumina introduces Ember and Oak and Serene at the Terrace, along with a Pool Grill and Pool Bar. The overall outdoor living space remains generous and social.

Deck 11: Jogging track and Aurelia Lounge replace Galileo’s Lounge. The Navigator’s observation lounge at the top of the ship becomes a more active space on Lumina, with a jogging track surrounding an open deck area and the Aurelia Lounge replacing Galileo’s as the social anchor on the upper deck.

Wellness deck: Lumina Spa replaces the original spa. The fitness center, aerobics studio, saunas, and beauty salon footprint stays largely intact. The rebrand to Lumina Spa reflects the overall identity shift, and the space appears to be refined rather than dramatically altered. For long-term residents, a well-equipped wellness facility matters far more than it does for a two-week cruise passenger.

Living on a ship is very different from vacationing on one. Residents don’t need constant entertainment, bars, or casinos. Instead, health and wellness replace the midnight buffet, and peace and quiet replace the bingo announcements and belly-flop contests.

Three Years Around the World

One detail from their press announcement that I think deserves more attention is the itinerary structure.

Avora Lumina plans to launch from Lisbon, Portugal and embark on a three-year continuous global circumnavigation, visiting more than 140 countries and over 400 destinations across all seven continents. The ship will spend up to five days in port at a time, prioritizing depth of experience over rapid port turnover.

But here is what really sets this apart. After the first circumnavigation, residents will have structured input into future itineraries. Chris Cox described it directly: “We are building a resident-driven global platform. After the first circumnavigation, owners will help shape where Lumina sails next. That fundamentally changes the residential cruise model.”

The ship is also polar-certified, enabling voyages to Antarctica and the Northeast Passage, destinations that most residential ships cannot access. And remember, it’s a smaller ship, allowing it to access far more ports than the giant cruise ships of today.

The company also announced “Golf around the world program” offering a once in a lifetime experience travelling around the world and playing at some of the best golf clubs in the world near the coast.  

Elevating the Culinary Experience

Avora is also making a serious commitment to food, which matters more than people give it credit for when you are living somewhere full time.

The culinary program will feature destination-inspired dining concepts that reflect the regions visited throughout the circumnavigation. Rotating seasonal menus, elevated wine programs, chef-led tastings, and locally sourced ingredients made possible through extended port stays will define the onboard dining experience.

This is not cruise ship food. This is a program built around the idea that what is on your plate should reflect where you are in the world.

Who Is It Built For?

Avora Lumina is designed for people who want to live, work, and travel the world from a single address that happens to move.

The conversion plan includes dedicated workspaces, with the casino being repurposed into productive work areas. High speed satellite internet powered by Starlink is expected onboard. I used Starlink on a recent cruise to Iceland and was able to make calls, join a podcast, and watch Netflix in the evening. The only challenge was finding a quiet place to work. That problem appears to be one Avora has thought about.

For remote workers, entrepreneurs, retirees, and founders, this is a genuinely compelling proposition. Launching a startup at sea is no longer a hypothetical.

What Does It Cost?

Avora has introduced pricing that is competitive for the ultra-luxury residential segment. Residences are expected to start around $545,000 and reach approximately $4.2 million for the largest homes onboard. A five-year ownership option is available starting around $219,600, priced at roughly 40 percent of a unit’s full value. 

Monthly fees for the smallest suites start at approximately $8,355 for single occupancy and $12,355 for double, covering an all-inclusive lifestyle that includes dining, housekeeping, concierge services, and continuous global travel.

Owners who are not onboard full time will also have the option to rent out their residences, which creates the possibility of offsetting ownership costs or generating a return. 

The Bigger Picture

Residential cruising is still a small market but it is growing. In 2025, the cruise industry carried approximately 37.7 million passengers worldwide. An estimated 30,000 to 40,000 of those took world cruises. The residential segment sits at a fraction of that number today, but projects like Avora Lumina are bringing it closer to the mainstream.

The founder of Avora Residences, Mikael Petterson, put it simply. “Residential cruising has proven its viability. Avora Lumina represents the next evolution, purpose-built for long-duration global living, expedition capability, and a more refined residential experience.”

Based on the demand Chris Cox described, the market appears to agree.

If you want to follow the story as it develops, join the Live at Sea Facebook Group or come back for more in depth articles about living at sea on LiveAtSea.com.

Live At Sea: Is This the Start of a
Whole New Way to Live?

Why We Launched the Live at Sea Community and Why More People are Starting to Consider Life on the Ocean.

Have you ever stopped and thought there must be more to life than grinding day after day in a career? Working untold hours and with the reward of spending a few hours at the park if the weather is just right on the weekend. 

That there must be a better way to live?

Don’t get me wrong. I love what I do and I’ll probably never stop working. But I believe there should be a balance between work, play, and life. One can still change the world and live a more balanced life.

I’ve spent a large part of my life traveling the world, one flight after another. At one point my executive team and I even managed to visit three countries in a single day. I’ve sat in boardrooms across the globe, stayed in countless hotel rooms, and spent more hours than I can count in airplane seats.

I went to China thirteen times but never saw the Great Wall. I traveled throughout Europe, but most of my memories are of train rides from one office to another or from one convention to the next. My idea of sightseeing was opening the curtains in the morning to see the view outside the hotel window.

I never had time to truly enjoy the places I visited. All I wanted was to get back home to my family.

Truth be told, I hate traveling.

I love being home.

And that’s exactly why I’ve been fascinated with the idea of living at sea for the past fifteen years.

At first, I tried to satisfy the urge by booking cruises. It started with a weekend cruise, then a week, then eventually a month. But inevitably the Larry David in me would come out and I’d start nit-picking everything I didn’t like about cruising. The crowds. The food. The noise.

So we tried ultra-luxury cruising and discovered that there is a more civilized way to experience life at sea. Unfortunately, like many things in this world, the price made it difficult to do regularly. And near the end of every cruise, my wife and I would feel a little depressed knowing it was almost over and we would not be back for another year.

That’s when the idea for the Live at Sea Facebook group was born.

The community that formed there has shared an incredible amount of information, insight, and personal stories about what it’s really like to live at sea. Topic after topic, I’ve been amazed by the firsthand experiences and practical knowledge people bring to the conversation.

It quickly became clear that the world needed a place to gather, organize, and share this information in one destination. That’s why the live at sea site exists.

More than 30 million people cruise every year, and the number continues to grow rapidly. Cruising has exploded in popularity over the last two decades. Yet only a very small number of people have taken the next step and chosen to actually live at sea.

For years this lifestyle was limited to a tiny group of wealthy residents aboard ships like The World, which launched in 2003.

But that may be starting to change.

The launch of Villa Vie Odyssey has introduced a residential cruise ship designed for people who want to try living at sea on a more sustainable budget. Even more developments are coming, including Avora Lumina, scheduled to launch in January 2028.

This is still a very small community by any standard, but it’s one that is growing quickly.

Innovation, entrepreneurship, lifestyle changes, and new technology are all contributing to the rise of what could become an entirely new way of living. One of the biggest turning points came in the early 2020s with the arrival of Starlink, which made high-speed internet available almost anywhere on the planet. For the first time, people can realistically work remotely, communicate with their family, and yes binge on Netflix from the middle of the ocean.

At LiveAtSea.com we intend to write about real stories by real people. The good and the bad. We will focus on facts and have rigorous editorial standards. It will be a destination for understanding all the nuances of the lifestyle from health care to Amazon shipments. 

What I’m most excited about is teaming up with the Live at Sea community to curate tips and tricks for navigating port cities — from shore excursions to the everyday essentials of living at sea.

For thousands of years humans have lived almost exclusively on land. But technology and pioneers are changing that. 

I believe that sometime in this century we could see one million people living at sea. I know this is a bold prediction. For many it may become a second home, but for others it will be a full-time lifestyle built around living, working, and exploring the world from the ocean.

My wife and I are excited to be part of this journey and one day call the ocean home. Feel free to say when you see us on the residential ship. In the meantime, join us on the journey together as pioneers of a new way of living by joining us on the Live at Sea Facebook Group.